The Pursuit of Worship Through Idolatry

While atheists reject the worship of a god or gods, they frequently satisfy their desire for meaning and purpose by turning to secular idols, often without recognizing it. The entertainment industry, particularly Hollywood and the music business, plays a central role in fulfilling this void. Celebrities, movie characters, musicians, and other public figures become objects of admiration and devotion, functioning as substitutes for the deities they deny.

Consider the obsession many have with musicians and actors—concerts become worship-like gatherings, with fans singing along, expressing their adoration, and seeking a connection with these figures. This behavior is not unlike the way religious individuals connect with their deities through prayer and worship. In the modern world, symbols and rituals exist that carry the same weight as religious symbols, yet are dismissed as mere entertainment. For example, musicians like Lady Gaga, Travis Scott, and Beyoncé are known to incorporate esoteric symbolism into their performances and lyrics. Symbols such as the Eye of Horus, pyramids, and pentagrams are often used, connecting back to ancient deities and occult practices. When these symbols are pointed out as possibly connected to spiritual forces, it is quickly dismissed as "conspiracy theory." Yet, the pervasiveness of such symbolism cannot be overlooked.

Worship of the Self and Materialism

Another manifestation of this desire to worship is found in the glorification of the self. Atheists, particularly those who are committed to scientific or philosophical pursuits, often elevate reason and human intellect to divine status. In this way, science becomes a new religion, and the individual assumes the role of a god over their own destiny. This self-worship is frequently supported by materialism, where the accumulation of wealth and possessions becomes the ultimate goal, replacing the pursuit of spiritual fulfillment. The irony here is clear: while atheists may reject traditional religious worship, they still engage in practices that elevate something—whether it be money, fame, or self—above all else.

The global obsession with wealth and material success mirrors the ways in which religious individuals seek blessings and divine favor. In fact, materialism has become a new kind of faith, where individuals place their trust in the idea that money and possessions will bring them happiness, security, and fulfillment. Yet, just as with misguided religious pursuits, this worship of materialism often leads to disappointment and emptiness. Studies have shown that while material wealth can provide comfort, it does not lead to long-term happiness or satisfaction.

Atheists may also engage in behaviors that closely resemble religious practices during major secular events. For example, consider the communal atmosphere and ritualistic behaviors associated with large sporting events, music festivals, and political rallies. These gatherings share many characteristics with religious ceremonies: communal chants, symbols (such as team logos or political slogans), and an emotional connection to something greater than oneself. Such events demonstrate the human desire for belonging and devotion, which can easily be channeled into secular outlets.

The entertainment industry, especially Hollywood and the music business, has capitalized on this human tendency, providing idols in the form of celebrities who become focal points for secular worship. Consumer Culture Theory (CCT), an area of sociology and marketing, sheds light on how individuals derive meaning and identity through consumption, particularly of goods associated with popular figures. This theory suggests that people see consumer goods not merely as products but as symbols that represent a sense of belonging, identity, and even purpose. For instance, the devoted fan base surrounding artists like Beyoncé and Kanye West is reflected in the high demand for their branded merchandise, reinforcing the notion of secular devotion. This trend mirrors religious practices where followers seek blessings and tokens from their deities, further blurring the line between secular admiration and religious idolatry.

The shift from worshiping an external deity to elevating oneself as the ultimate authority is a hallmark of secular humanism, a worldview that places human reason and self-actualization at the center. According to philosopher Charles Taylor in A Secular Age, the elevation of human intellect and autonomy in secular societies often replaces traditional forms of religious devotion. This self-worship extends beyond intellectual pursuits to material wealth, where possessions and achievements become symbols of one’s "divinity." In the same way that ancient societies revered statues and relics of gods, modern individuals elevate material possessions and personal accomplishments as markers of value and meaning. This pursuit of self-glorification often leads to disappointment, as material wealth, while providing temporary comfort, fails to satisfy the deeper spiritual needs inherent to human nature.

Celebrity Influence: Modern-Day Idolatry

In the entertainment industry, several celebrities have been known to openly incorporate occult and satanic symbolism into their performances, lyrics, and even fashion. Artists like Lady Gaga, Travis Scott, and Beyoncé, among others, have made headlines for the symbolic gestures they make on stage. For example, Lady Gaga's 2017 Super Bowl performance included symbolism that some interpreted as satanic​(Loudwire)​(Grunge), and her use of imagery associated with the occult is well-documented. Similarly, Travis Scott's 2021 Astroworld tragedy reignited discussions about satanic symbolism in his concerts, with some attendees claiming the event felt like a "concert in hell," complete with demonic imagery​(Loudwire)​(Grunge).

Beyond the controversy of individual performances, artists frequently incorporate overt occult symbols in their shows. The use of pentagrams, the number 666, and even direct references to Satan have become increasingly common, especially in the genres of heavy metal and rap. For instance, Doja Cat's 2023 performance featured blatant satanic imagery with references to demonic possession​(Loudwire)​(Grunge). These displays of symbolism often go unnoticed or dismissed as artistic expression, but they undeniably influence the younger generations who idolize these performers.

In addition to the academic studies showing the profound psychological effects of celebrity worship, there is also evidence pointing to the intentional use of occult symbolism by celebrities to increase their influence. Many artists, particularly in the music industry, use symbols associated with ancient pagan gods and goddesses, often cloaked in the guise of fashion or performance art. Beyoncé has been frequently noted for wearing jewelry and clothing that incorporate symbols from ancient Egypt and Greek mythology. According to The Secret History of the World by Jonathan Black, the recurring use of such symbols in public settings can serve as a form of unconscious initiation for the masses​(Loudwire)​(Grunge).

Further evidence can be found in the lyrics and performances of artists like Jay-Z, who has been accused of incorporating occult symbols like the All-Seeing Eye and the pyramid—symbols heavily associated with Freemasonry and the Illuminati​(Loudwire)​(Grunge). These symbols, far from being benign, are tied to spiritual forces that align with ancient practices of pagan worship, drawing attention away from traditional religious practices and creating an environment ripe for spiritual confusion, particularly among impressionable audiences. The normalization of these symbols in media subtly guides the public toward unconscious participation in occult rituals and the glorification of alternative deities.

The influence celebrities have on youth is further exacerbated by media targeting children and adolescents through video games, movies, and shows. Celebrities like Beyoncé and Kanye West are not just musicians but cultural icons whose influence stretches far beyond the stage. This constant exposure leads to an idolization of these figures, often surpassing the influence of parents. Children are bombarded with images of their favorite characters and celebrities on social media, YouTube, and even in video games, creating an unbreakable connection between their identity and the figures they idolize.

The economic impact of celebrity worship cannot be understated, particularly when one examines the significant portion of money spent on celebrity-related products. The success of movie franchises such as Star Wars, Harry Potter, and Marvel is often attributed to the intense devotion of their fans. According to a study published in the Journal of Business Research, fans of franchises often treat their favorite characters and stories with a reverence that closely resembles religious worship. This is evident in the sales figures, with the Marvel Cinematic Universe alone generating over $22 billion in box office revenue globally​(Grunge).

Beyond movies, celebrities like Rihanna and Kanye West have launched lucrative fashion and cosmetic lines, with fans spending millions on products tied to their favorite stars. The continuous cycle of spending reinforces a culture where the worship of these celebrities becomes intertwined with consumerism, blurring the lines between religious devotion and material obsession. This behavior mirrors traditional religious practices where devotees would spend money on offerings, religious artifacts, or pilgrimages. Ironically, while atheists might reject organized religion, they often invest their hard-earned money in consumer products tied to celebrities who themselves use religious or occult imagery to market their brands​(Grunge).

This becomes particularly evident in the realm of video games and animated shows, where characters become symbolic idols for children. Many of these games and shows subtly introduce themes of mysticism, occultism, and alternative spirituality, which can shape a child's worldview before they have even had the opportunity to explore their own beliefs.

In popular culture, the use of occult and esoteric symbols has increasingly emerged as a subtle yet powerful form of influence. Artists such as Lady Gaga, Travis Scott, and Beyoncé have incorporated symbols like pentagrams, the All-Seeing Eye, and references to ancient deities into their performances and music. Manly P. Hall, in The Secret Teachings of All Ages, suggests that such symbols are not simply artistic choices but are laden with spiritual and psychological impact. These symbols have roots in ancient pagan and occult practices, which the entertainment industry uses to create a subliminal connection to alternative spiritual paths. This symbolic language, dismissed by some as "conspiracy theory," nonetheless profoundly shapes the minds of young fans who idolize these figures, planting seeds of occultism that might otherwise go unnoticed.

The Irony of Atheistic Worship: While atheists may claim to reject traditional religious practices as irrational, their behavior suggests a deep involvement in forms of worship that resemble religious devotion. Consider how much time, money, and energy are invested in these modern idols. From concert tickets to branded merchandise, atheists and the non-religious often spend considerable amounts of money on items associated with their chosen "gods"—celebrities, athletes, or even fictional characters from comic books and movies.

For example, the global obsession with superhero culture exemplifies this behavior. People spend billions of dollars on Marvel or DC Comics merchandise, attending movie premieres in costume and even adopting the personas of these characters in their daily lives. While these are fictional figures, the fervor with which they are idolized mirrors religious devotion. In fact, the line between myth and reality is often blurred when characters like Thor or Wonder Woman, who have direct ties to ancient pagan deities, are worshiped in a manner similar to how people of the past revered the gods they represent.

Social Dynamics: Worship in Disguise: Another crucial aspect of modern idolatry is the way it facilitates social bonding. In social gatherings, conversations about celebrities, athletes, or even fictional characters often become the focal point of interaction. These discussions mimic religious dialogues, where individuals either praise or critique the "idols" of their group. Sports fans, for example, are notorious for their intense emotional involvement with their teams, often using phrases like "we won" or "we lost" to express their connection. This is not unlike how religious communities rally around a shared belief, reinforcing their social bonds through collective worship​(Loudwire)​(Grunge).

I personally believe this attachment stems not necessarily from the greatness of the sport or the quality of a celebrity's performance but from the human desire to invest their worshipful energy somewhere. As you noted, this attachment can be tested by committing to the God of Israel, the one deity who promises to fulfill this deep-seated desire for worship. When people commit themselves fully to the worship of God, the need for these secular idols diminishes, as they find fulfillment in something far more profound than any celebrity or sports team could provide.

According to sociologist Émile Durkheim's theory of collective effervescence, people derive a sense of communal identity from their shared experiences, which are often centered around symbols and rituals. In today's society, these symbols are often linked to celebrities or brands, and the rituals involve consuming media, attending concerts, or engaging in social media interactions about the latest celebrity gossip. This social behavior highlights the persistent human need for worship, even in secular contexts, and demonstrates that atheism does not free individuals from the need for communal bonding through shared devotion​(Grunge).

Group psychology demonstrates that people have an inherent need to connect over shared experiences, often through symbols and rituals. This is visible in secular contexts like sports fandoms and pop culture conventions, where team logos, chants, and costumes create a collective identity. Scholars in social psychology emphasize that such gatherings fulfill the same social and emotional needs that religious ceremonies traditionally served. As a result, these secular assemblies foster a sense of community and belonging, using symbols that evoke powerful emotional responses akin to those in religious groups. This phenomenon shows that humans, regardless of belief systems, seek unity in ritualistic, symbol-laden gatherings, reinforcing a shared purpose and identity among participants.

What I think of Atheism

One reason I don’t align with atheism is that, while I value the logic and skepticism often associated with it, atheism frequently lacks consistency and offers little of substance beyond criticism. I want to make it clear that my perspective doesn’t target all atheists but rather certain groups who identify as atheists and spend an excessive amount of time attacking or discrediting religious beliefs, particularly Christianity. A true atheist, in my view, is someone who finds insufficient evidence for a god but remains open to the possibility and respects the significance of faith in others’ lives. They may not engage in religious practices, but they acknowledge that faith can be deeply meaningful to many and don’t feel the need to debate its validity at every turn.

However, there are atheists who invest significant time and resources attempting to disprove or discredit religion—knowing they can’t fully disprove it. Often, their motivations are rooted in trauma, entitlement, resentment, or even greed. For example, some come from backgrounds where they faced harm or exploitation within a religious community. Using Christianity as an example, it’s clear that many churches in the West have been corrupted. People seeking community or spiritual growth may find themselves used for money, emotional support, or worse by manipulative leaders. While I deeply sympathize with these victims, it’s essential to understand that human nature is fallible, and even good things can be twisted when flawed people are involved.

When individuals realize they’ve been misled, it’s often too late, and the resulting anger can turn into a blanket resentment toward Christianity or religion as a whole. Human nature drives us to externalize our pain, especially when emotions run high. Instead of targeting the specific church or leaders responsible, they may spend years “educating” others by cherry-picking Bible verses or sharing critiques aimed at discrediting Christianity. Social media has amplified this, enabling controversial content to gain attention—and income—through reactions and views. For those who say, “I read the Bible and still got taken advantage of, which is why I’m now an atheist,” my question would be: Did you consider seeking a different community, one aligned with true Christian teachings?

This brings us to the concept of Religious Trauma Syndrome (RTS), recognized by psychologists as a condition experienced by those harmed within religious environments. People affected by RTS often direct their frustration at faith itself rather than the specific individuals or groups who caused their pain. Their criticism, although rooted in personal experiences, tends to be more emotional than rational. Seen through the lens of RTS, their attacks reveal unresolved hurt, making it clear that their crusade against religion is more about personal healing than objective analysis.

Another group comprises entitled atheists, who dismiss religious texts without even reading them, deeming them unworthy of their time. They demand concrete proof, failing to see the contradiction in their own logic. Christianity, for instance, teaches that faith is foundational—an approach that does not cater to arrogance or entitlement. Expecting irrefutable evidence before committing to faith is akin to demanding fitness results before starting a diet and exercise plan. Faith requires investment before results can be experienced. Nevertheless, these entitled atheists often invest their own time into discrediting religion, particularly Christianity. Whether driven by insecurity or the lure of financial reward, they dig through religious texts for controversial verses to showcase, gaining attention in the process. They may even confront believers with questions like, “If God created the universe, who created God?” not seeking answers but hoping to score points in a debate.

"Scientific atheists" often reject religion, using science as their primary justification. Many of these individuals perceive themselves as intellectually superior to religious people, and when they engage in debates, it's often more about self-promotion and feeding their ego through followers’ admiration than any genuine openness to spirituality. While they claim not to believe in any god, there's an irony in how much they crave recognition and praise for their knowledge. For instance, someone with a strong background in cosmology might indeed understand the stars’ movements better than most, but they sometimes seem to expect to be revered as if they created and control those stars themselves.

These individuals may feel frustration when a religious person attributes creation to God instead of acknowledging their insights. Though they may present themselves as guided solely by knowledge, their motivations are often rooted in the same stubbornness, ego, and entitlement found in other groups. They argue they can't commit to anything they can't fully prove or understand. Some of them are married too—but, hey, we live in time where we can definitively prove that our significant other will never leave or betray us, right? After all, relationships are surely based on certainties, not on trust and faith like those of religious people.

Among the most curious are the “critical” atheists who may study theology or even earn PhDs in religious studies without believing in any of it. Their scholarship may be impressive, but I question the motives of those who dedicate themselves to something they don’t fundamentally believe in. They spend significant resources studying a text available for free, only to offer reinterpretations that align with their own perspectives. The Bible explicitly warns against private interpretations, yet these individuals present their views as authoritative. For those seeking spiritual guidance, I pose this analogy: Would you take fitness advice from someone with a PhD in sports science who’s never exercised and weighs 500 pounds? Likely not, because you know their credentials alone don’t guarantee practical wisdom or experience. The same applies to spiritual matters; a theologian who doesn’t practice faith is no better equipped to guide you than a first-time reader.

Critical atheists often flaunt their academic titles, as if these carry weight in spiritual discussions. Their content aims to provoke believers and cater to other atheists seeking an “academic” take on religion. While obtaining diverse perspectives is valuable, relying solely on someone who’s never applied faith in their life is misleading. The Bible’s teachings are accessible to anyone willing to read and engage with them earnestly. Building a personal foundation of understanding is crucial. Don’t idolize anyone’s interpretation, no matter how credentialed they are. Ultimately, your spiritual journey should involve direct engagement with the source material—the Bible—and not rely on intermediaries for meaning.

To me, atheism is ultimately a futile position. Even if I were to agree with their points, what then? Atheists who endlessly criticize religion offer nothing in return. All you’re left with is their satisfaction in “proving” a point. If I debate a Muslim, I know that they have my best interests at heart; they want me to follow the god they believe is real to reach heaven. If I debate a Hindu, they hope I can escape the cycle of rebirth and reach enlightenment. But an atheist has only their interests at heart. They simply want to be right, with no plan beyond that. For those who were once religious, this is even more problematic. Humans are inherently worshipful beings. You may convince me there’s no God, but my desire for worship is as real as my hunger, and I’ll find a way to fulfill it—likely through worldly things, such as celebrities, possessions, or even self-worship. In that case, we’re back to where we started. Atheism hasn’t saved me; it’s only replaced a holy, powerful God with man made idols.

Conclusion

Atheism, then, is often a misguided attempt to remain rational and avoid superstition. Yet, ironically, many atheists lead lives that are fundamentally similar to those of religious individuals. Whether through the idolization of celebrities, the pursuit of material wealth, or self-worship, atheists are still driven by the same deep-seated desire for devotion and purpose. This demonstrates that the human inclination to worship cannot be eliminated; it can only be redirected. Atheism does not truly provide freedom from worship—it merely shifts the focus from gods to other forms of idolization.

In exploring these secular substitutes for worship, it becomes evident that the drive for devotion and reverence is deeply embedded within human nature. Whether through devotion to a deity, celebrity, or one’s own intellect, people continuously seek something beyond themselves to revere and pursue. Atheism, which positions itself as a break from religion, ultimately shifts this devotion toward secular idols rather than erasing it. Thus, the real question becomes not whether we will worship, but who or what will receive that worship. This choice shapes an individual’s values, sense of purpose, and perception of the world, underscoring that worship, in some form, is an unavoidable part of the human experience.

When one recognizes the undeniable fact that worship is a fundamental part of the human experience, the question becomes not whether we will worship, but whom or what we will worship. Atheism may deny the existence of gods, but it does nothing to eliminate the human need to devote oneself to something greater. Whether that object of devotion is a deity, a celebrity, or the self, the basic need remains the same.

By exploring these truths, we can better understand that atheism is not an escape from religion but simply a different way of channeling the same inherent desires. The decision each individual must make is where to direct that worship: toward fleeting, material things, or toward the One who created all things and instilled this desire within us.

Back to Top

Back Home